Skip to content

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT

Charity rating & review

82/100 Clarity Score · 3 stars · Charity Commission filings · How we score

Verified · Charity Commission data
82 /100

Clarity score

Good

Is THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT a good charity?

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT scores 82/100 (Good) on our Clarity Score, with 75% of spending going to charitable activities and accounts up to date. This reflects financial transparency and stewardship from Charity Commission filings — not the real-world impact of its programmes. See the full breakdown.

Middlesbrough · UK-wide · TS18 3HR Reg 1146401 Registered charity Charity Commission register

Mission

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT is a registered charity (no. 1146401) working in animals across the United Kingdom. Its latest Charity Commission filing directs 75% of spending to charitable activities, holding roughly 1 months of reserves, and files its annual accounts on time. Income has been growing over recent years. CharityCompare's Clarity Score rates the organisation only from public Charity Commission accounts — accountability, financial health, efficiency and community support — not the quality or impact of its programmes.

In short: THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT scores 82 out of 100 (3 stars). 75% average program spend (3-year average). Review the pillar breakdown below.

Overview

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT has a Clarity Score of 82 out of 100 on CharityCompare (3 stars, Good). Charity Commission registration number 1146401. Status: Registered. Primary cause area: Animals. Latest accounts year 2020: total income £989k, with 75% of expenditure on charitable activities. Accounts filing: up to date. Reserves: approximately 1 months of operating costs. 1 filing concern(s) noted on this profile. Scores are independent and based on official filings — not a donation recommendation.

Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .

Overall score

82/100

3★ · Good

Cause spend

75%

3-yr avg · charitable activities

Accountability

100/100

Finance beacon

Income

£989k

Latest year 2020

Reserves

1 mo

Months of running costs

Accounts filing

On time

Charity Commission

Fundraising efficiency not stated · 0% overhead · No website on register · Confidence: medium

How THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT compares

Clarity Score benchmarked against similar UK charities — higher is better.

Income band (£500k–£1m)82 vs 78 avg

Ranks higher than 60% of 2,157 charities in its income band.

Animals charities82 vs 76 avg

Ranks higher than 64% of 2,982 charities in this cause.

Data & confidence

Source
Charity Commission (E&W)
Accounts year
2020
Filing date
2026-06-24 00:00:00.0000000
Profile reviewed
2026-06-25

Medium confidence — some data missing or late

Scores reflect the latest annual accounts on the register. Impact, leadership, and culture beacons require information beyond public filings.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Charity Commission for England and Wales . Open Government Licence v3.0 .

Beacon report

Detailed accountability and finance metrics from Charity Commission filings — structured for transparency in our four-beacon report.

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

100/100

Accountability & Transparency metrics for THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT
Metric Score Value
Filing history (5 years)

100% on-time over five years = 15 pts · one late filing = 5 pts · two or more = 0 pts.

100% 15/15 pts
Trustee oversight

Three or more trustees on the register = 15 pts · one or two = 0 pts (governance red flag).

100% 6 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies

Safeguarding (4) · conflict of interest (3) · volunteer management (3) — from Charity Commission annual return.

100% 10/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

40/100

Financial Health metrics for THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT
Metric Score Value
Reserves (months of cash)

3–24 months = 15 pts · 1–3 months = 7 pts · under 1 month or over 3 years (hoarding) = 0 pts.

47% 1 months · 7/15 pts
Income stability / growth

Positive or stable three-year revenue trend = 10 pts · sustained decline = 0 pts.

0% 0/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets

Low debt (< 30% liabilities to assets) = 5 pts · high debt = 0 pts.

100% 1% · 5/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

100/100

Financial Efficiency metrics for THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT
Metric Score Value
Program expense ratio

≥ 75% on charitable activities = 10 pts · 60–75% = 5 pts · below 60% = 0 pts.

100% 75% · 10/10 pts (3-year average)
Fundraising efficiency

Spends ≤ £0.20 to raise £1 = 10 pts · £0.21–£0.35 = 5 pts · above £0.35 = 0 pts (fundraising cost ÷ income).

100% 0p per £1 income · 10/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

100/100

Community Support metrics for THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT
Metric Score Value
Volunteer-to-staff ratio

More volunteers than paid staff = 10 pts · equal mix = 5 pts · no volunteers = 0 pts.

100% 50 volunteers / 10 staff · 10/10 pts

How we calculate beacon scores →

Clarity Score

82/100 total · Good · 3 of 4 stars

Four pillars (40 + 30 + 20 + 10 points) from Charity Commission filings — see methodology for full weightings.

100/100
Accountability & Transparency
40/100
Financial Health
100/100
Financial Efficiency
100/100
Community Support

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

100/100

Filing history (5 years)15/15 pts
Trustee oversight6 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies10/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

40/100

Reserves (months of cash)1 months · 7/15 pts
Income stability / growth0/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets1% · 5/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

100/100

Program expense ratio75% · 10/10 pts (3-year average)
Fundraising efficiency0p per £1 income · 10/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

100/100

Volunteer-to-staff ratio50 volunteers / 10 staff · 10/10 pts

Revenue & expenses

Latest filed year 2020 · Source: Charity Commission annual accounts

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT revenue and expenses for 2020
Category Amount % of spend
Total income £989k
Total expenditure £846k
Charitable activities £827k 98%
Fundraising £18k 2%
Governance & admin £126k 15%
98%On charitable activities

Where the money goes

Latest accounts (2020) · £846k spent

  • Charitable activities98%
  • Fundraising2%
  • Governance15%

Trust indicators

Pulled from the Charity Commission register — filing behaviour, board size, and workforce where reported.

  • Accounts filed on time

    up to date · last filing 2026-06-24 00:00:00.0000000

  • Trustee board size (3–12)

    6 trustees on the Charity Commission register

  • Workforce on register

    10 employees · 50 volunteers (5:1 volunteer-to-staff)

Fundraising Regulator

Status not yet checked

Separate from our financial scores — shows whether the charity follows the Code of Fundraising Practice.

Check Fundraising Regulator →

Official register

Reg 1146401

Full trustee list, accounts, and regulatory history on the Charity Commission.

View on Charity Commission →

Trustees & officers

  • NIGEL JOHN GOODWAY since 2011
  • Jonathan David Evans since 2018
  • Roger John Wooldridge since 2017
  • Colin Michael Sainsbury since 2021
  • Tina Jane Hammond since 2024
  • Susan Roberta Brooks since 2024
How we score charities +

The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK Charity Commission data. Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10). A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.

Full methodology →

Accountability & Transparency

Scored from filings

40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15), declared policies (10).

Financial Health

Scored from filings

30 points — reserves (15), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5).

Financial Efficiency

Scored from filings

20 points — program expense ratio (10), fundraising efficiency (10). Kept at 20% to avoid punishing legitimate infrastructure costs.

Community Support

Scored from filings

10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data.

Overall score

Sum of all pillar points. Translated to stars: 90–100 Exceptional (4★), 75–89 Good (3★), 60–74 Needs improvement (2★), below 60 Poor (1★).

Five-year trends

£0k £300k £600k £900k £1200k 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Income 2020: £989k Spending 2020: £846k Cause spend 2020: £827k Income 2021: £626k Spending 2021: £659k Cause spend 2021: £649k Income 2022: £308k Spending 2022: £392k Cause spend 2022: £294k Income 2023: £310k Spending 2023: £273k Cause spend 2023: £205k Income 2024: £208k Spending 2024: £230k Cause spend 2024: £172k
  • Income
  • Spending
  • Cause spend

Values in £ thousands · Source: Charity Commission accounts

Key facts

Overall score
82/100 (3★)
Income
£989k
Cause spend
75% of expenditure
Reg number
1146401
Scope
UK-wide
Reserves
1 months
Trustees
6
Accounts year
2020
Filing
up to date

Similar animals charities

Top-rated peers by CharityCompare score

Share & export

Share: XLinkedInFacebookBluesky

Opens a printer-friendly view of this profile for THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT.

For this charity

Add your rating to your site

Free to use — a lightweight HTML badge or an embeddable score widget, each linking back to this independent profile and our methodology.

Red flags

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT's rating, finances, and Charity Commission status.

What is THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT's charity rating? +

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT scores 82 out of 100 on CharityCompare (3 stars — Good). The Clarity Score V1 sums four pillars from Charity Commission filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 pts), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10).

Is THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT a good charity to donate to? +

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT scores 82 out of 100 (3 stars — Good) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, our independent read of its Charity Commission filings. Around 75% of its spending goes to charitable activities and its accounts are up to date. That reflects how transparent and financially healthy it looks on paper — it does not measure the real-world impact of its work, so treat it as one factor alongside the cause you care about. CharityCompare never tells you where to donate.

Is THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT a legitimate UK charity? +

Yes — THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT is registered with the Charity Commission for England and Wales under registration number 1146401. You can verify the entry on the official register.

What is THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT's Charity Commission registration number? +

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT's registration number is 1146401. Official register: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/1146401

How much income does THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT receive? +

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT reported £989k total income in its 2020 accounts, based on Charity Commission filings. Five-year trend: growing.

What percentage of THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT's spending goes to charitable activities? +

Approximately 75% of total expenditure went to charitable activities in the latest filed year. Fundraising was 0% and combined overhead (fundraising plus governance) was 0%.

Are THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT's accounts up to date? +

Filing status: up to date (last filing 2026-06-24 00:00:00.0000000). CharityCompare flags late or missing accounts separately from the financial score.

Where is THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT based? +

THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT is listed at Middlesbrough · UK-wide · TS18 3HR and operates UK-wide, focused on animals.

How does CharityCompare score THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT? +

We analyse Charity Commission annual accounts using three-year averages for program expense, fundraising efficiency, and overhead; working capital from reserves vs average expenditure; liabilities-to-assets from the latest balance sheet when available. Impact, leadership, and culture beacons are not yet assessed from public data alone. See our methodology for weights and thresholds.

Does CharityCompare recommend donating to THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT? +

No. CharityCompare provides independent scores and facts from official filings. We do not tell you where to donate or earn commission from charities.

How can I compare THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT with other charities? +

Use our free compare tool to put THE MATTHEW TREE PROJECT side-by-side with other UK charities on scores, finances, and filing status.